|
|
|
|
|
Developing
strategy that makes a difference
Building
a regional way of working: developing a social strategy.
We
worked with members of the Health & Social Inclusion Panel of one of the
Regional Assemblies who had set themselves the challenge of developing a
regional social strategy that local agencies would use and value. We designed
and facilitated a workshop for 50 people from numerous perspectives and levels
of operation - parish, county, voluntary sector, local government - to explore
how a regional strategy could add value to what they do.
We researched and presented ideas of social exclusion using a framework
that allowed participants to share their different experiences of inequalities
in a purposeful way. This enabled
them to go on to thrash out mutual responsibilities between local areas and the
region, and the terms of engagement for how they wanted to work together. We
wrote a plain English report that summarised the ideas and proposals.
A
city - wide strategy for urgent and emergency care.
We
were engaged to work with a team from an Acute Teaching Hospital Trust ‘trying
to get GPs on board’ and get clinicians talking to each other.
From this starting point we worked over several months to develop a
participative approach to creating a city-wide strategy for urgent and emergency
care. This successfully engaged GPs and other clinicians as well as citizens,
and the many other agencies involved in providing emergency care services in the
city.
We
used system mapping processes which helped people recognise ‘we’re in this
together’. We established a multi-agency planning group of around 20 people
from the statutory and voluntary sectors and worked with them to develop a draft
strategy. This built on the existing plans of the organisations involved, but
was re-cast in the form of strategy appropriate to a system in which there is no
single formal power structure. We devised a simple format for testing examples
of local action plans already in the pipeline against the whole system strategy.
We wrote a functional analysis of ways in which an emergency care system
responds to people’s requests.
The
group then brought together around 120 people for a 2-day ‘Real Time Strategic
Change’ event during which the strategy was redrafted overnight.
This rapid and public response to the views of stakeholders was received
enthusiastically by people used to traditional consultation processes.
|
|